Leo Hickman in the Guardian: A poll this week showed that only 34% of America's white evangelical Protestants accepted there is solid evidence that global warming is real and that it is attributable to humans.
Here's his bottom line:
It's a popular rebuke made by climate change sceptics that environmentalism displays all the traits of a religion (the words "pot", "kettle" and "black", spring to mind for some reason), but I have to say I'm left perplexed when I even attempt to understand the logic of creation care through the prism of evangelicalism.
Many millions of people hold these views so it would be foolish to ignore this huge constituency, but how do you even go about responding to such beliefs?
Scratch, meet itch. Most frustrating to me are Christians labeling other Christians who haven't completely bought into global warmism as against creation care. As if.
Anyway, scan the post's comments for some interesting answers.
UPDATE: Maybe "unaffiliated" Christians are just more prone to being swayed by global warmist emotionalism; Catholics, the Gospel community and Evangelicals, not so much. And what are those Hispanic Catholics thinking, I wonder...
UPDATE: Here's another take on "perplexed."
UPDATE: Pete Illyn in Newsweek:
The good and bad with the environmental movement was that Christians were first introduced to environmentalism through climate change. That may have been a bad place to start because there was a lot of skepticism. It may have been too atmospheric, too faith-based, too "Do I believe, or do I not believe?" For the average pastor, that's a problem.
Right on, Pete. It's also a problem for many in the pews.
UPDATE: Here's a Lifeway poll on pastors. They're split 50/50 on the question.
By the way, nobody asked me (heh) but I'm with the my Gospel brothers and sisters on this one. Climate change is largely natural, has been influenced by human CO2 and other pollutants, and there's a big we really don't know what we don't know factor thrown in for good measure.

read this post
Recent Comments